By Dr. Tim Orr

The Qur'an, a monumental text in Islamic scholarship, is revered and recited by millions globally. Despite its significance, the Qur'an's origins and composition methods continue to spark scholarly intrigue and debate. Andy Bannister's An Oral-Formulaic Study of the Qur'an (2014) introduces a revolutionary perspective by applying oral-formulaic theory—traditionally used in analyzing Homeric epics—to the Qur'an. This innovative approach challenges conventional views and opens new avenues for understanding the Qur’an’s composition and its deep connection to the oral traditions of the Arabian Peninsula.

The Significance of Bannister's Work for Christian Scholarship

Bannister's study is particularly significant within the Christian intellectual tradition, especially for those engaged in apologetics and interfaith dialogue. By applying the oral-formulaic theory to the Qur'an, Bannister equips Christians with a scholarly tool to foster a nuanced understanding of the Qur'an’s development. This insight is crucial for constructive theological engagement with Muslims, providing a foundation for dialogue that respects the historical and cultural contexts of the Islamic text while affirming the unique claims of Christian theology.

Understanding the Qur'an's oral roots allows for a more respectful and informed dialogue between Christians and Muslims. Bannister's work helps to highlight the complexities and nuances of the Qur'anic text, which can lead to deeper interfaith understanding and cooperation (Neuwirth, 2010; Motzki, 2001). For Christian scholars, this perspective is invaluable as it aids in constructing arguments that are both theologically sound and historically contextualized (Neuwirth, 2010).

Central Theme: Bannister's Oral-Formulaic Approach

Bannister's study centers on the oral-formulaic theory, suggesting that the Qur'an, like the epics studied by Milman Parry and Albert Lord, was composed using repetitive and formulaic linguistic structures. This method facilitated memorization and transmission, supporting the view that the Qur'an was primarily an orally composed text before being documented. Bannister draws on extensive research in oral tradition to substantiate his claims, demonstrating that the Qur'an's structure is consistent with orally composed texts (Parry & Lord, 1954; Foley, 1988).

Bannister's analysis reveals how the Qur'an's unique structure, with its rhythmic and repetitive patterns, aligns with oral-formulaic techniques used in other ancient oral traditions. This perspective reinforces the Qur'an's connection to pre-Islamic Arabian culture and highlights its adaptability and resilience as an orally transmitted text (Nöldeke, 2000; Powers, 2009).

Critical Insights from Bannister's Study

Formulas and Repetition: The Qur'an's recurring phrases and structural elements facilitated memorization and ensured consistency across generations. Bannister notes that the Qur'an's use of formulas and repetitive structures is akin to those found in other oral traditions, where such techniques are crucial for preserving and transmitting large bodies of text orally (Rubin, 1995; Schoeler, 2006).

Flexibility in Composition: The narrative structure reflects the oral tradition's capacity to evolve, suggesting the Qur'an’s stories were tailored to the audience's needs. This flexibility indicates that the Qur'an's content was adapted during oral recitations to address its audience's immediate concerns and questions, which is a hallmark of oral traditions (Rubin, 1995; Motzki, 2001).

Mnemonic Devices: Strategies such as rhythmic patterns and structured pauses enhanced the Qur'an's oral transmission. These devices helped listeners memorize and recall the text, ensuring its preservation before it was compiled in written form (Schoeler, 2006; Neuwirth, 2010).

Oral Performance: Bannister emphasizes the Qur'an's performative nature. Initially intended to be heard rather than read, this performative aspect underscores the Qur'an's importance as a recited text designed to be delivered and received orally (Nöldeke, 2000; Powers, 2009).

Comparative Analysis: Bannister strengthens his argument for the Qur'an’s oral roots by drawing parallels with other oral traditions. Comparative studies of texts such as the Homeric epics and other oral literature illustrate common features that support the thesis of the Qur'an's oral composition (Parry & Lord, 1954; Foley, 1988).

Expanded Discussion on the Oral Nature of the Qur'an

Bannister’s research explores the possibility that the Qur'an's oral traditions were not merely a medium of transmission but also a method of composition. He identifies elements like formulaic language, performance variants, and contextual references that suggest an audience familiar with the narrative, indicative of oral composition. Furthermore, there is compelling evidence suggesting Muhammad's use of Biblicist material, which, although not yet translated into Arabic, was available and conveyed orally to his audience over twenty-three years. The Qur'an's composition appears to have occurred in real-time during oral performances as Muhammad responded to his audience's inquiries. This strongly supports the thesis that the Qur'an was shaped by formulaic borrowing, evident through repeated phrases across the text, which underscore its oral compositional nature (Griffith, 2013; Tisdall, 1905).

Examining the use of Biblicist material further supports the hypothesis of the Qur'an's orality. The text reflects improvised performances or sermons by an oral preacher—Muhammad—who utilized available Biblicist traditions. This material was adapted on the fly rather than copied verbatim, demonstrating a dynamic and responsive oral tradition rather than a static written one (Powers, 2009; Rubin, 1995). Sidney H. Griffith's The Bible in Arabic: The Scriptures of the ‘People of the Book’ notes that the translation of the Bible into Arabic likely occurred after the establishment of the Qur'an as a written scripture, suggesting that the oral traditions predating this were significant and widely recognized (Griffith, 2013).

W. St. Clair Tisdall's The Original Sources of the Qur'an identifies multiple influences—from ancient Arabian beliefs to Christian and Jewish traditions—that were assimilated into the Qur'an. Muhammad managed This synthesis of ideas orally, drawing from a well-established pool of oral traditions rather than through direct literary consultation, given his affirmed illiteracy. This background underscores the extensive oral culture that predated and influenced the Qur'anic text (Tisdall, 1905; Schoeler, 2006).

The narrative of Iblis and Adam reiterated multiple times in varying contexts within the Qur'an, exemplifies the challenges posed by both traditional and critical scholarly approaches to understanding the text. Its repeated but variably detailed recounting aligns with the characteristics of oral storytelling adapted to the needs of specific audiences and circumstances (Nöldeke, 2000; Neuwirth, 2010).

Conclusion

Andy Bannister's application of oral-formulaic theory to the Qur'an represents a significant scholarly advancement in understanding the composition of the Islamic text. By framing the Qur'an within the context of oral traditions, Bannister opens new avenues for interpreting its structure and transmission. This perspective enriches Islamic scholarship and facilitates more nuanced interfaith dialogues, particularly within Christian scholarship. The recurring use of formulas, mnemonic devices, and oral performance elements highlighted by Bannister and supported by numerous scholarly sources underscores the dynamic and adaptive nature of the Qur'an's transmission and composition. This approach underscores the importance of considering the Qur'an's oral roots, which provides deeper insights into its development and role in the Arabian Peninsula's cultural and religious fabric.

References

Bannister, A. (2014). An Oral-Formulaic Study of the Qur'an. Lexington Books.

Foley, J. M. (1988). The Theory of Oral Composition: History and Methodology. Indiana University Press.

Griffith, S. H. (2013). The Bible in Arabic: The Scriptures of the 'People of the Book'. Princeton University Press.

Motzki, H. (2001). The Biography of Muhammad: The Issue of the Sources. Brill.

Neuwirth, A. (2010). The Qur'an and Late Antiquity: A Shared Heritage. Oxford University Press.

Nöldeke, T. (2000). The History of the Qur'an. Brill.

Parry, M., & Lord, A. B. (1954). The Singer of Tales. Harvard University Press.

Powers, D. S. (2009). Muhammad Is Not the Father of Any of Your Men: The Making of the Last Prophet—University of Pennsylvania Press.

Rubin, L. J. (1995). The Eye of the Beholder: The Life of Muhammad as Viewed by the Early Muslims. Princeton University Press.

Schoeler, G. (2006). The Oral and the Written in Early Islam. Routledge.

Tisdall, W. St. C. (1905). The Original Sources of the Qur'an. SPCK.

Share this article
The link has been copied!