In "The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy," Sowell turns his sharp analytical skills to the intellectual and political elites who, in his view, impose their ideological vision on society, often to detrimental effect.
By Dr. Tim Orr
Thomas Sowell, a renowned economist, social theorist, and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, has left an indelible mark on contemporary thought with his incisive critiques of economic and social policies. In "The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy," Sowell turns his sharp analytical skills to the intellectual and political elites who, in his view, impose their ideological vision on society, often to detrimental effect. While this book offers a profound critique of contemporary progressivism, it is crucial to recognize that Sowell’s insights apply to any ideological elite that may arise, including potential future movements like populism. Twenty years from now, a different set of elites could emerge, bringing their problematic ideas to the forefront.
I will explore Sowell's key points to illustrate how these critiques apply to the contemporary progressive left and offer a detailed analysis of the intersections between ideology and policy. While my usual writing focuses on theological discussions and interfaith dialogue, my mind has been preoccupied with this subject for the past week, compelling me to delve into this critical political analysis.
Sowell (1995) describes the vision of the anointed as a set of beliefs held by intellectual elites who see themselves as enlightened and morally superior. This vision drives them to impose their policies on society, regardless of empirical evidence or public opinion. The progressive left often positions itself as morally superior, advocating for policies they believe are inherently just, such as LBGTQ+ causes, universal healthcare, climate action, and social justice initiatives (Pearson, 2017). For instance, while noble in intent, the push for universal healthcare sometimes overlooks the complexities of implementation, such as the economic impact on the healthcare industry and the potential for decreased quality of care (Gruber, 2011). Similarly, the Green New Deal proposes extensive environmental reforms but often downplays the economic trade-offs and feasibility of such sweeping changes (Hayward, 2019). Sowell’s identification of the anointed’s vision is insightful, highlighting how ideological beliefs can shape policies detached from practical realities. His critique underscores the importance of grounding policies in the experiences and needs of the broader population. A more inclusive and empirical approach can improve outcomes by considering diverse perspectives and real-world implications.
Sowell (1995) asserts that the anointed often ignore or reinterpret evidence contradicting their beliefs. Instead of using empirical data to inform policy decisions, they rely on their ideological convictions, leading to policies that can fail or worsen the problems they aim to solve. The progressive left has been criticized for selectively using evidence to support their positions, particularly on issues like minimum wage increases and immigration policies (Neumark & Wascher, 2007). For example, while advocating for a $15 minimum wage, some progressive downplay studies suggest potential negative impacts on small businesses and employment rates, instead focusing on the benefits of increased wages (Meer & West, 2016). In the realm of immigration, policies aimed at sanctuary cities often ignore data on crime rates and economic strain on local resources (Cohen & Hsu, 2018). Sowell’s insistence on the role of evidence in policymaking is crucial. By emphasizing the need for policies to be informed by empirical data, Sowell advocates for a more rational and effective approach to governance. This perspective encourages continuous evaluation and adaptation of policies based on measurable outcomes, fostering accountability and improvement.
In various domains such as education, crime, and welfare, Sowell (1995) illustrates how the policies driven by the anointed have led to adverse consequences. These policies, he argues, often exacerbate the very issues they were intended to address. Progressive educational policies, such as the push for standardized testing and Common Core, have sometimes led to unintended consequences like teaching to the test and increased stress among students and teachers (Au, 2011). Criminal justice reforms aimed at reducing incarceration rates have occasionally increased crime rates in certain areas, highlighting the complex nature of policy impacts (Rosenfeld & Wallman, 2019). For instance, the defunding of police departments in some cities has been followed by spikes in crime rates, demonstrating the unintended negative consequences of well-meaning reforms (Maguire et al., 2020). Examining policy areas where the vision of the anointed has led to negative outcomes serves as a valuable lesson in humility and learning from mistakes. Sowell’s analysis encourages policymakers to consider their actions' long-term and unintended consequences. This approach promotes a more cautious and reflective attitude towards policy implementation.
Sowell (1995) critiques the moral posturing of the anointed, who present their views as inherently morally superior. This self-righteous attitude prevents them from engaging with alternative perspectives and acknowledging the practical realities ordinary people face. The progressive left often uses moral posturing, framing their policies as the only morally acceptable choices and labeling dissenters ethically deficient (Lukianoff & Haidt, 2018). This can be seen in debates over climate change, where those who question the feasibility of certain green policies are sometimes dismissed as climate deniers or morally irresponsible (Pielke, 2010). Similarly, the labeling of opponents to certain social justice initiatives as racists or bigots shuts down meaningful dialogue and alienates potential allies (Clegg, 2020). Sowell’s critique of the moral certainty of the anointed is a call for humility and empathy. Recognizing that no single group monopolizes moral truth can foster more inclusive and respectful dialogues. By valuing diverse perspectives, policies can be more balanced and better tailored to address the complexities of real-world issues.
Sowell (1995) explores how the anointed uses persuasive rhetoric to frame debates in moral terms, casting their opponents as ignorant or morally inferior. This rhetorical strategy allows them to advance their vision without substantive debate or accountability. The progressive left frequently employs moral rhetoric to advance their agendas, often portraying their opponents as backward or uncaring (Shapiro, 2019). For instance, in healthcare debates, progressives might label those opposing single-payer systems as lacking compassion rather than engaging with their economic or logistical concerns. The use of terms like "Medicare for All" and "healthcare as a human right" are powerful rhetorical tools that simplify complex policy debates into moral imperatives (Lambrew et al., 2019). Understanding the anointed's rhetorical strategies helps foster more honest and constructive debates. Sowell’s analysis encourages individuals to evaluate the arguments presented to them critically and to seek out diverse viewpoints. This awareness can lead to more informed and balanced discussions on policy issues.
Sowell (1995) introduces the concept of "cosmic justice," where the anointed strive for an ideological form of justice that transcends traditional legal and moral standards. This quest often leads to policies that aim for utopian outcomes without considering practical limitations and human nature. The progressive left's pursuit of social justice often embodies the quest for cosmic justice, aiming to rectify historical and systemic inequalities through sweeping reforms (Formisano, 2015). While noble in intent, such efforts sometimes overlook practical challenges and can lead to policies that are difficult to implement effectively, such as comprehensive reparations programs (Coates, 2014). While aiming to address historical wrongs, these programs often face significant logistical, economic, and political hurdles that can undermine their success. Sowell’s critique of the quest for cosmic justice highlights the dangers of pursuing idealistic policies without considering practical limitations. By advocating for a more pragmatic approach, Sowell emphasizes the importance of achievable goals and realistic expectations in policymaking. This perspective can lead to more effective and sustainable solutions.
Sowell (1995) emphasizes the importance of recognizing trade-offs in policymaking. The anointed often promotes policies as solutions without acknowledging the inevitable trade-offs and costs, leading to unintended negative consequences. Progressive policies frequently downplay the trade-offs involved. For instance, while advocating for expansive social programs, there is sometimes insufficient discussion about the economic costs and potential negative impacts on taxation and business incentives (Glaeser, 2011). The push for renewable energy sources similarly often underestimates the trade-offs regarding economic impacts on industries and communities dependent on fossil fuels (Kumar, 2017). The costs of transitioning to a green economy, including job losses in traditional energy sectors, are often minimized or ignored in public discourse (Stewart & Loveday, 2016). Sowell’s emphasis on trade-offs is a vital reminder that every policy decision involves costs and benefits. Recognizing and addressing these trade-offs can lead to more transparent and responsible policymaking. This approach encourages a more comprehensive evaluation of policies, considering their positive and negative impacts.
Sowell (1995) discusses how policies that fail are often defended or expanded rather than reconsidered. The anointed’s commitment to their vision leads them to persist with failed policies, attributing the lack of success to insufficient implementation or external factors. When failing to deliver the expected results, Progressive policies are often defended by attributing their shortcomings to inadequate implementation or external resistance (Haskins & Sawhill, 2009). For example, the continuation of certain welfare programs despite evidence of inefficiency is often justified by claiming that they were not properly funded or supported. Similarly, educational reforms that fail to improve student outcomes are sometimes expanded rather than reevaluated, with proponents arguing that the failures are due to incomplete implementation rather than flawed design (Cohen & Moffitt, 2009). Sowell’s discussion on the persistence of failed policies underscores the need for flexibility and adaptability in governance. Policymakers can better serve the public interest by being open to reevaluating and changing course when necessary. This attitude fosters a culture of continuous improvement and learning from experience.
Thomas Sowell’s “The Vision of the Anointed” critiques elite-driven policies prioritizing ideological beliefs over practical effectiveness. By emphasizing the importance of evidence, recognizing trade-offs, and fostering humility and inclusivity, Sowell advocates for a more grounded and empirical approach to policymaking. His insights are particularly relevant in critiquing the contemporary progressive left, whose well-intentioned policies often mirror the issues Sowell identifies. His arguments encourage continuous learning, accountability, and a commitment to addressing the real-world needs and experiences of the broader population.
Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st-century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 25-45.
Clegg, R. (2020). The moral imperative of inclusion. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 43(2), 477-499.
Coates, T. N. (2014). The case for reparations. The Atlantic, 313(5), 54-71.
Cohen, C., & Hsu, S. (2018). Sanctuary cities and crime. Journal of Urban Economics, 108, 25-37.
Cohen, D. K., & Moffitt, S. L. (2009). The ordeal of equality: Did federal regulation fix the schools? Harvard University Press.
Formisano, R. P. (2015). For the people: American populist movements from the Revolution to the 1850s. University of North Carolina Press.
Glaeser, E. L. (2011). Triumph of the city: How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. Penguin Press.
Gruber, J. (2011). Universal health insurance coverage and the Massachusetts experience. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(2), 83-106.
Haskins, R., & Sawhill, I. (2009). Creating an opportunity society. Brookings Institution Press.
Hayward, S. F. (2019). The green new deal and its critics. National Review, 71(7), 28-34.
Kumar, S. (2017). The renewable energy transition: Is it possible? Renewable Energy Journal, 105, 1-12.
Lambrew, J. M., Lambrew, A. C., & Podesta, J. D. (2019). Medicare for All: An analysis. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 44(2), 257-283.
Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2018). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. Penguin Press.
Maguire, E. R., Nix, J., & Campbell, B. A. (2020). Examining the effects of proactive policing on crime and disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(3), 715-740.
Meer, J., & West, J. (2016). Effects of the minimum wage on employment dynamics. Journal of Human Resources, 51(2), 500-522.
Neumark, D., & Wascher, W. (2007). Minimum wages and employment. Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics, 3(1-2), 1-182.
Pearson, J. L. (2017). The progressive legacy: Policies and politics in the American past. Historical Journal of Massachusetts, 45(1), 1-15.
Pielke, R. A. Jr. (2010). The climate fix: What scientists and politicians won't tell you about global warming. Basic Books.
Rosenfeld, R., & Wallman, J. (2019). Crime trends and forecasting. Annual Review of Criminology, 2, 17-35.
Shapiro, B. (2019). The right side of history: How reason and moral purpose made the West great. Broadside Books.
Sowell, T. (1995). The vision of the anointed: Self-congratulation as a basis for social policy. Basic Books.
Stewart, E., & Loveday, D. (2016). The economic impacts of transitioning to renewable energy. Journal of Energy Policy, 98, 258-270.
The ideas in this blog are mine, but AI was used to help create the content.
